Legal

S. K. Jain VS Union of India

Armed Forces Tribunal Act (55 of 2007) , S.15(6)— Army Act (46 of 1950) , S.69, S.63— Appeal against court martial -Substitution of punishment – An Army commandant was found by GCM to be guilty of charges of corruption and possession of ammunition – On appeal, Tribunal found the charge of corruption to have not been proved – Conviction under Arms Act was also found to be not sustainable as the evidence did not support possession of ammunition without license – However, finding on same charge was substituted and appellant was held guilty of act prejudicial to good order and discipline – In taking a lenient view on established fact of recovery of ammunition on the basis of evidence on record , tribunal had modified punishment from dismissal to compulsory retirement – Tribunal had exercised its discretion under Section 15(6) of the 2007 Act in a just and proportionate manner balancing disciplinary needs of service with fairness to the individual – No interference in exercise of said discretion was warranted.

Source link

creativebharatgroup@gmail.com

About Author

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may also like

Legal

Cryptocurrencies huge risks to financial stability: RBI Governor, ET LegalWorld

Cryptocurrencies are huge risks to financial stability, and monetary stability, Reserve Bank of India Governor Shantikanta Das said Friday, asserting
Legal

District courts ‘foundation of our justice system’, says V-P Dhankhar, ET LegalWorld

The judiciary is the most important aspect of India and no court is “subordinate”, Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar said on Sunday.