Legal

Haseena VS United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Motor Vehicles Act (59 of 1988) , S.168— Motor accident – Death claim – Death whether direct result of accident – Determination – Deceased involved in accident, suffered minor fractures and non-healing ulcer on his foot – Five months later, while undergoing skin-grafting surgery for ulcer, he died of pulmonary embolism/acute myocardial infarction – Doctor admitted that initial injuries were not serious in nature – Doctor also stated that victim had history of high cholesterol and mild blood pressure, and that cause of death was not definitively confirmed due to family’s refusal to allow post-mortem examination – Mere “proximity” of accident to death was not sufficient to establish direct causal link – Even preponderance of probability was not found – In absence of conclusive evidence to prove such nexus, High Court had rightly considered claim for injuries but rejected claim for compensation for death

Source link

creativebharatgroup@gmail.com

About Author

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may also like

Legal

Cryptocurrencies huge risks to financial stability: RBI Governor, ET LegalWorld

Cryptocurrencies are huge risks to financial stability, and monetary stability, Reserve Bank of India Governor Shantikanta Das said Friday, asserting
Legal

District courts ‘foundation of our justice system’, says V-P Dhankhar, ET LegalWorld

The judiciary is the most important aspect of India and no court is “subordinate”, Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar said on Sunday.